nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20230317-185238-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 230317s2023||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20230317-185238-0 doi eng 342 23 Harel, Alon Author aut Separating Substance from Procedure: How to Address the Israeli Constitutional Crisis Harel, Alon Verfassungsblog 2023-03-17 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Many proposals to resolve the current Israeli constitutional crisis have been recently advanced. Yet, most of them are arguably unlikely to bring about a compromise. This is so not because their content cannot be accepted by the parties involved, but because they do not address the substantive concerns of the parties. Israel's constitutional crisis results from the fact that the parties to the conflict shape their proposals concerning the decision-making process in a way that is conducive to their short-term substantive interests. Any proposed solution must therefore separate substantive questions from procedural and institutional ones. CC BY-SA 4.0 Constitutional Crisis Constitutional Reform Israel Knesset Klement, Alon Author aut Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/separating-substance-from-procedure-how-to-address-the-israeli-constitutional-crisis/ raw object