nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/dd77504c9eae2abd DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 241112s2024||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/dd77504c9eae2abd doi eng 342 23 Nollkaemper, André Author aut Lessons of a Landmark Lost - The Judgment of the Hague Court of Appeal in Shell v Milieudefensie Nollkaemper, André Verfassungsblog 2024-11-12 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier On 12 November 2024, the Hague Court of Appeal in Shell v Milieudefensie set aside the preceding 2021 judgment which held Shell responsible for its contribution to climate change. The 2021 judgment was widely heralded (though also critiqued) as groundbreaking and a precedent that could be followed elsewhere. While the Appeal judgment is unlikely to receive similar praise from climate activists, it contains important lessons regarding the responsibility of multinational companies for their contributions to climate change. CC BY-SA 4.0 Climate Climate Crisis Climate obligations Corporate Due Diligence Klimaschutz Netherlands Shell business and human rights climate change litigation climate litigation (DE-588)7547705-1 gnd Klimaschutz Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/shell-milieudefensie-climate-litigation/ raw object