<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20231005-233558-0</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/slicing-away-at-regulatory-statutes/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Slicing Away at Regulatory Statutes - On Sackett v. EPA</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Mendelson, Nina A.</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2023-10-05</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Administrative Law</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Chevron</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>environmental law</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Environmental Protection</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EPA</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>major questions doctrine</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>In its June 2023 decision in Sackett v. EPA, the U.S. Supreme Court interpreted the Clean Water Act of 1972 to significantly cut back its water pollution protections and to hand an important victory to private property owners.  Sackett is not simply important for its impact on environmental protection.  Although it may be among the Court’s less visible recent rulings, it follows the Court’s trend of anti-administrativist rulings and may add importantly to the Court’s kit of anti-regulatory interpretive tools.   </dc:description>
</dc>
