nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20181017-093930-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 181013s2018||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20181017-093930-0 doi eng 342 23 Prete, Luca Author aut Some Thoughts on Facultative and Obligatory Mixity after Singapore and COTIF, and before CETA Prete, Luca Verfassungsblog 2018-10-13 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The conclusion of agreements as ‘mixed’, that is jointly by the European Union and its Member States, is a legal phenomenon peculiar to the EU legal order. Notwithstanding the almost complete silence of the Treaties on the point, mixity quickly became common practice for the Union and was, in most instances, readily accepted by its contractual partners. That does not mean, however, that mixity has not given rise, to date, to lengthy and often heated debates within, between and before the EU institutions. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 EU competences EuGH isds mixed agreements Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/some-thoughts-on-facultative-and-obligatory-mixity-after-singapore-and-cotif-and-before-ceta/ raw object