nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20220314-121212-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 220314s2022||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20220314-121212-0 doi eng 342 23 Statement by Retired Judges of the Constitutional Tribunal on the the Constitutional Tribunal Judgment in case K 7/21 Verfassungsblog 2022-03-14 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Retired judges of the Constitutional Tribunal state that the judgment in question is another scandalous example of jurisprudence violating the Constitution. Challenging Article 6 of the ECHR for the second time in a short period of time (previously in the judgment of 24.11.2021, K 6/21) is a drastic jurisprudential excess. CC BY-SA 4.0 Art. 6 ECHR Polish Constitutional Tribunal Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/statement-by-retired-judges-of-the-constitutional-tribunal-on-the-the-constitutional-tribunal-judgment-in-case-k-7-21/ raw object