nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/5ede8d1de4c9c3c7 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 240412s2024||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/5ede8d1de4c9c3c7 doi eng 342 23 Rocha, Armando Author aut States’ Extraterritorial Jurisdiction for Climate-Related Impacts Rocha, Armando Verfassungsblog 2024-04-12 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier States’ extraterritorial jurisdiction was one of the hot topics decided by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in Duarte Agostinho. Strictly speaking, the “lack of it” led the ECtHR to declare the complaint inadmissible with respect to all defendant States except Portugal. This finding is in line with previous ECtHR case law but highlights a gap in human rights protection and creates a mismatch between the ECtHR’s case law and that of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR) and the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). CC BY-SA 4.0 Climate Crisis climate litigation Duarte Agostinho ECHR ECtHR Extraterritoriality Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/states-extraterritorial-jurisdiction-for-climate-related-impacts/ raw object