<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<marc21:record xmlns:marc21="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <marc21:leader>nam  22     uu 4500</marc21:leader>
  <marc21:controlfield tag="001">10.59704/9b1c61a9577c8e19</marc21:controlfield>
  <marc21:controlfield tag="003">DE-Verfassungsblog</marc21:controlfield>
  <marc21:controlfield tag="007">cr|||||</marc21:controlfield>
  <marc21:controlfield tag="008">241120s2024||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng||</marc21:controlfield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" ">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">10.59704/9b1c61a9577c8e19</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="2">doi</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">eng</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">342</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="2">23</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">Santos Cunha, Bruno</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="e">Author</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="4">aut</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">Taming the Brazilian Supreme Court - Public Concerns and the Constitutional Implications of Weakening Judicial Review in Brazil</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="c">Santos Cunha, Bruno</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1">
    <marc21:subfield code="b">Verfassungsblog</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="c">2024-11-20</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">Text</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="b">txt</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="2">rdacontent</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">Computermedien</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="b">c</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="2">rdamedia</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="b">cr</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="2">rdacarrier</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">The recent Proposal for Constitutional Amendment No. 28/2024 weakens constitutional review by allowing Congress to suspend certain decisions of the Supreme Federal Court. This article identifies several exaggerated and premature criticisms present in the public debate. Additionally, it explores how models of weak judicial review, successfully integrated by numerous established democracies, may foster constitutional dialogues and collaboration, potentially reducing counter-majoritarian frictions and enhancing democratic principles.</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">CC BY-SA 4.0</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">Brasil</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">Brasilien</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">Constitutional Reform</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">The Supreme Federal Court</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">Weak judicial review</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
    <marc21:subfield code="0">(DE-588)4008003-1</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="2">gnd</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="a">Brasilien</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">Borges Uliano, André</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="e">Author</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="4">aut</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="t">Verfassungsblog</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="x">2366-7044</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
    <marc21:subfield code="u">https://verfassungsblog.de/taming-the-brazilian-supreme-court/</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="y">raw object</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
</marc21:record>
