nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20200610-133619-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 200610s2020||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20200610-133619-0 doi eng 342 23 Reichert-Facilides, Daniel Author aut Taming the Karlsruhe Dragon - Three practical proposals Reichert-Facilides, Daniel Verfassungsblog 2020-06-10 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In order to reconcile the conflicting claims for primacy within the parameters set by the BVerfG and EU law, the German parliament could (and should) amend the procedural rules for the BVerfG: the first, and most fundamental of these changes would provide for an order to conduct a referendum on whether Germany should exercise its right to withdraw from the EU under Art. 50 TEU as the only definitive judicial remedy available if a conflict between EU law and the German constitution cannot otherwise be resolved. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Art. 50 TEU BVerfG ECJ Referendum Ultra Vires Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/taming-the-karlsruhe-dragon/ raw object