<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/1ac4e9c4f5e7f662</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/territorial-concessions-to-the-aggressor/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Territorial Concessions to the Aggressor - (In-)Validity of a Prospective Peace Treaty Between Russia and Ukraine?</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Herbert, Felix</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2025-01-06</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>International Law</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Russian War against Ukraine</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Zwingendes Recht</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>jus cogens</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Zwingendes Recht</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>How can Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine be brought to an end? With recent proposals by the Trump transition team, a possible peace treaty with Ukraine and Russia is gaining renewed attention. Gregory Fox predicts that “territorial transfers […] would likely be at the heart of any agreement”. The rule on coerced treaties (Art. 52 VCLT) poses a major legal obstacle to territorial concessions to an aggressor state. Under that rule, a treaty is void if its conclusion has been procured by an unlawful threat or use of force. That notwithstanding, a treaty invalid under Art. 52 VCLT can be validated by the UN Security Council (UNSC), a solution that is also compatible with jus cogens.</dc:description>
</dc>
