<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/b7aa4c52e7a4fdf3</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/text-is-not-enough/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Text Is Not Enough - Effective and Systemic Compliance in EU Rule-of-Law Governance</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Drinóczi, Tímea</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2026-02-19</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Hungary</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Rule of Law</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Ungarn</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>systemic assessment</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Ungarn</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>Advocate General Ćapeta’s Opinion in Case C-225/24, of 12 February 2026, clarifies that, in contexts of systemic rule-of-law deterioration, compliance cannot be measured solely by legislative text, while also explaining the constraints of discretionary power in EU fund cases. Rule-of-law compliance must be assessed through effective implementation and attention to the broader constitutional environment. The Opinion articulates an evaluative logic for EU rule-of-law governance that is particularly significant in backsliding settings and foreshadows the standards required for constitutional reconstruction after illiberal rule.</dc:description>
</dc>
