nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20180702-173606-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 180702s2018||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20180702-173606-0 doi eng 342 23 Bárd, Petra Author aut The AG Opinion in the Celmer Case: Why Lack of Judicial Independence Should Have Been Framed as a Rule of Law Issue Bárd, Petra Verfassungsblog 2018-07-02 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier On 28 June 2018, Advocate General Evgeni Tanchev delivered his Opinion in the Case C‑216/18 PPU Minister for Justice and Equality v LM on the surrender of a crime suspect to Poland. The issue is whether Mr. Artur Celmer, referred to by the Opinion as LM, should be surrendered from Ireland to Poland when there are serious doubts as to whether he would receive a fair trial, due to the alleged lack of independence of the judiciary resulting from recent changes to the Polish judicial system. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Celmer Constitutional Capture EU rule of law framework fair trial judicial independence van Ballegooij, Wouter Author aut Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/the-ag-opinion-in-the-celmer-case-why-lack-of-judicial-independence-should-have-been-framed-as-a-rule-of-law-issue/ raw object