<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20180705-145922-0</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/the-ag-opinion-in-the-celmer-case-why-the-test-for-the-appearance-of-independence-is-needed/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>The AG Opinion in the Celmer Case:  Why the Test for the Appearance of Independence is Needed</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Krajewski, Michał</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2018-07-05</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Aranyosi</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Celmer</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>European Arrest Warrant</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>judicial independence</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Mutual Trust Principle</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Rule of Law</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-NC-ND 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>In this post, I focus on what I believe is the most important question in the Celmer case: what kind of a test for the rule of law/fair trial, and with how many prongs? I argue that the rule of law/fair trial test that the Court should apply is the test for the appearance of independence, known from the practice of the ECtHR. I also argue that the Court should not leave the application of this test to the referring court but carry it out by itself.</dc:description>
</dc>
