nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20161108-132832 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 161108s2016||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20161108-132832 doi eng 342 23 Wienbracke, Mike Author aut The Article 50 Litigation and the Court of Justice: Why the Supreme Court must NOT refer Wienbracke, Mike Verfassungsblog 2016-11-08 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Is the UK Supreme Court in the current Brexit case obliged to refer to the Luxembourg Court? If that were the case, the conformity of any Member State’s EU exit with its own constitutional requirements would be open to review by the CJEU – and hence could no longer be qualified as an act of self-determination since a EU institution would have the final say on it. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Art. 50 TEU brexit Referral to the ECJ Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/the-article-50-litigation-and-the-court-of-justice-why-the-supreme-court-must-not-refer/ raw object