<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/c7db695de259138a</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/the-bmw-and-mercedes-climate-cases/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>The BMW and Mercedes Climate Cases - Judicial Restraint at the Bundesgerichtshof?</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>de Jong, Elbert</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Reiff, Marvin</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2026-05-08</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>BGH</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Climate Crisis</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>climate litigation</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Neubauer</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>private law</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Tort</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>The Bundesgerichtshof – Germany's highest court of civil jurisdiction – has handed down its first ruling on private climate liability and dismissed the widely discussed lawsuits against BMW and Mercedes. These strategic lawsuits were based on a very specific claim that is hard to replicate in other legal systems. Nevertheless, the rulings contain general considerations that, from a comparative law perspective, reveal a remarkable degree of judicial restraint.</dc:description>
</dc>
