nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/cb48a5b36bd65db0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 260209s2026||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/cb48a5b36bd65db0 doi eng 342 23 de Jong, Elbert Author aut The Bonaire Climate Case - State Mitigation Obligations after KlimaSeniorinnen de Jong, Elbert Verfassungsblog 2026-02-09 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Once again, all eyes were on The Hague. After groundbreaking rulings in the Urgenda and Shell cases, the District Court in The Hague on 28 January delivered another important climate change decision in the case of Greenpeace Netherlands v. The Netherlands (Bonaire). The court, acknowledging the contested political context in which the ruling was made, sought to square the circle of state mitigation obligations by balancing potentially far-reaching considerations about the mitigation efforts required from states like the Netherlands with an innovative procedural and dialogue-oriented remedy. CC BY-SA 4.0 bonaire climate litigation KlimaSeniorinnen Mitigation van Asselt, Harro Author aut Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/the-bonaire-climate-case/ raw object