nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20180730-095503-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 180729s2018||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20180730-095503-0 doi eng 342 23 van Ballegooij, Wouter Author aut The CJEU in the Celmer case: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back for Upholding the Rule of Law Within the EU van Ballegooij, Wouter Verfassungsblog 2018-07-29 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Surrender cases are litmus tests for the EU’s approach towards the enforcement of the rule of law in the Member States. Without judicial independence and other elements of the rule of law concept, EU law will cease to be operational, whether in the context of the single market or outside of it. Aranyosi and LM are the beginning of a long journey. In a more general sense, these cases demonstrate that ultimately – as in all incomplete constitutional systems – it is the courts which play a crucial role in carving out and applying rule of law and fundamental rights exceptions. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Bárd, Petra Author aut Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/the-cjeu-in-the-celmer-case-one-step-forward-two-steps-back-for-upholding-the-rule-of-law-within-the-eu/ raw object