nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20231002-233631-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 231002s2023||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20231002-233631-0 doi eng 342 23 Weiler, Joseph H.H. Author aut The Comeback of the Mixed Chamber - Institutional reform and competence creep in an enlarged Union Weiler, Joseph H.H. Verfassungsblog 2023-10-02 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Three years ago, in the wake of the Weiss judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court, we proposed the creation of a “Mixed Chamber” in the Court of Justice of the European Union, to rule in last instance on judicial disputes on points of Union competence. The rationale of a Chamber so composed is not obvious. After all, in a Union in which EU Law has primacy over national law, in which the autonomy of EU law is all-pervasive and where the Court of Justice is the ultimate interpreter of EU law, why should a Mixed Chamber be needed? We believe there are at least three good reasons that make a Mixed Chamber as salient as ever. CC BY-SA 4.0 competences Court of Justice Mixed Chamber primacy of EU law Weiss Sarmiento, Daniel Author aut Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/the-comeback-of-the-mixed-chamber/ raw object