nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20200929-220645-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 200929s2020||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20200929-220645-0 doi eng 342 23 Ott, Andrea Author aut The “Contamination” of EU Law by Informalization? - International Arrangements in EU Migration Law Ott, Andrea Verfassungsblog 2020-09-29 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The examples in this post demonstrate that the EU is an autonomous international actor independent from its Member States, but it is tied up internally by its institutional procedures and restrained by its attributed powers. This governance system requires complex and time-consuming negotiations within the Union and with its international partners, which might end up in Court (Singapore, CETA Opinions) or delay ratification (Istanbul Convention). The EU’s painful practice concerning treaty-making (with complicated rules, extensive case law and long negotiations of often comprehensive mixed agreements) is clearly not fit for purpose in times of crisis. CC BY-SA 4.0 informalisation Migration Management Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/the-contamination-of-eu-law-by-informalization/ raw object