nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20220224-001128-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 220223s2022||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20220224-001128-0 doi eng 342 23 Abanazir, Cem Author aut The Court of Arbitration for Sport’s Multifarious Views on Freedom of Expression Abanazir, Cem Verfassungsblog 2022-02-23 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In sport, the fine line between ‘political’ and ‘non-political’ expression is vital because certain expressions could potentially result in disciplinary sanctions. Dubbed as the ‘supreme court of world sport’, the Court of Arbitration for Sport (‘CAS’) is pivotal in interpreting and adjudicating cases involving freedom of expression in international sports. Currently, the CAS jurisprudence tends to fail to provide clear and consistent reasoning. CC BY-SA 4.0 Freedom of Expression Sport Governing Bodies Sport Law Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/the-court-of-arbitration-for-sports-multifarious-views-on-freedom-of-expression/ raw object