<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/161f88ca7263a06f</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/the-end-of-an-unlawful-era/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>The End of an (Unlawful) Era - On the Danish Supreme Court´s judgement concerning the non-penalization of refugees</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Jarlner, Asta S. Stage</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Scott Ford, Sarah</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2025-07-15</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>asylum</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>asylum procedure</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>danish supreme court</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Dublin III</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU Criminal Law</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>non-penalization</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>subsidiary protection</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>On June 17th, the Danish Supreme Court delivered an important judgement concerning the principle of non-penalization of refugees, ending decades of unlawful prosecutorial practices. A closer reading points to longstanding deficiencies in informing asylum seekers of their rights during the procedure. Moreover, questions remain regarding the interpretation of Article 31 for beneficiaries of subsidiary protection.</dc:description>
</dc>
