The Essence of Privacy, and Varying Degrees of Intrusion Scheinin, Martin Author aut (orcid)0000-0001-9511-0867 Text xx# 2015 Verfassungsblog 2015-10-07 eng
electronic resource
remote
Computermedien
Online-Ressource
 What is remarkable in the CJEU's Schrems decision is that a) the Court actually identified the intrusion in question as falling under the notion of the essence of privacy – something the European Court of Human Rights has never done under the privacy provision of ECHR Article 8, and b) the identification of an intrusion as compromising the essence of privacy meant that there was no need for a proportionality assessment under Article 52 (1.2) of the Charter. For these reasons, the Max Schrems judgment is a pathbreaking development, a major contribution to the understanding of the structure and legal effect of fundamental rights under the Charter. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Scheinin, Martin data protection Digital Rights Ireland EuGH European Charter of Fundamental Rights privacy Schrems 342 https://verfassungsblog.de/the-essence-of-privacy-and-varying-degrees-of-intrusion-2/ Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH 10.17176/20170330-152748 151007 10.17176/20170330-152748 Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl (Revision 1.140 20200717)