<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20170907-230438</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/the-eu-as-the-appropriate-locus/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>The EU as the Appropriate Locus of Power for Tackling Crises: Interpretation of Article 78(3) TFEU in the case Slovakia and Hungary v Council</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Ovádek, Michal</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2017-09-07</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>asylum</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>CJEU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>CJEU Jurisdiction</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Institutions</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>legislative procedure</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>relocation mechanism</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Right to Asylum</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>separation of powers</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-NC-ND 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>The CJEU’s judgment in Slovakia and Hungary v Council of 6 September 2017 raises important instutional questions. As the Court implicitly recognises the EU as the appropriate forum for taking effective action to address the emergency situation created by a sudden inflow of third country nationals, it adopts its tendency towards purposive and effectiveness-oriented jurisprudence to asylum law.</dc:description>
</dc>
