<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/46c0bf69da593b72</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/the-european-approach-to-human-rights-based-climate-litigation-in-global-context/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>The European Approach to Human Rights-Based Climate Litigation in Global Context - Difference, Deference, Consolidation</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Jahn, Jannika</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2025-12-06</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>Human rights-based climate protection does not stem from a single, coherent regime but from a plurality of intersecting normative orders. This contribution examines how divergent approaches to climate-related obligations unfold across regional systems, UN bodies, and the ICJ, with particular attention to the contours of the European approach.</dc:description>
</dc>
