nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/5fa74fe147c6dd1d DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 240104s2024||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/5fa74fe147c6dd1d doi eng 342 23 Mota Delgado, Miguel Author aut The European Game - The ECJ and its Sports Model after 'European Super League' Mota Delgado, Miguel Verfassungsblog 2024-01-04 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The long-awaited judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-333/21 - European Super League Company has finally arrived. There is a lot to unpack, especially with respect to developments in competition law. Constitutional lawyers will, however, find particular interest in how the Grand Chamber dismissed Advocate General Rantos’ pitch for a constitutional recognition of the European sports model based on Article 165 TFEU. This post focuses on this aspect of the European Super League judgment. It argues that while the Advocate General’s construction was rejected, the Court still used this judgement to further define its own constitutional understanding of the European sports model, as well as to solidify its role as the primary interpreter of that model. CC BY-SA 4.0 ECJ Europarecht Europäischer Gerichtshof | Luxemburg (Stadt) FIFA FIFA | Zürich Football Governance Superleague UEFA | Nyon sports (DE-588)4153206-5 gnd Europarecht (DE-588)5103273-9 gnd Europäischer Gerichtshof | Luxemburg (Stadt) (DE-588)210096-4 gnd FIFA | Zürich (DE-588)2040319-7 gnd UEFA | Nyon Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/the-european-game/ raw object