nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/39c185c884081a6b DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 231219s2023||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/39c185c884081a6b doi eng 342 23 Emborg, Tekla Author aut The EU’s Pacing Problem - Why crafting and enforcing AI regulation is hard Emborg, Tekla Verfassungsblog 2023-12-19 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The EU regulators face a pacing problem. This has been demonstrated several times during the legislative process of the AI Act itself: for example, the initial Commission proposal from 2021 did not include a definition of General Purpose AI (GPAI). The proposal did not anticipate the rise of Large Language Models like ChatGPT and GPT-4 but only addressed AI systems designed for specific purposes. This lacuna in the original proposal has haunted the EU Parliament, Council and Commission in the past final weeks of the trilogue negotiations, where the inclusion of so-called Frontier Models has been hotly contested. This blog post explores potential boosters for the EU's capacity to regulate AI: delegated legislation, soft law, and a centralized AI office. CC BY-SA 4.0 A.I. Artificial Intelligence Europäische Union. Rat | Brüssel (DE-588)7683617-4 gnd A.I. Artificial Intelligence (DE-588)5100052-0 gnd Europäische Union. Rat | Brüssel Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/the-eus-pacing-problem/ raw object