<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.7" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-7.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>The Findings of the ICJ Advisory Opinion  on the Oslo Accords and the Amici Curiae Proceedings before the ICC in the Situation of Palestine - A Swift Glance</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal" usage="primary">
    <namePart>El Zeidy, Mohamed M.</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Author</roleTerm>
    </role>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource/>
  <genre authority="rdacontent">Text</genre>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">xx#</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <dateIssued encoding="marc">2024</dateIssued>
  </originInfo>
  <originInfo eventType="publisher">
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text"/>
    </place>
    <publisher>Verfassungsblog</publisher>
    <dateIssued>2024-10-16</dateIssued>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marccategory">electronic resource</form>
    <form authority="marcsmd">remote</form>
    <form type="media" authority="rdamedia">Computermedien</form>
    <form type="carrier" authority="rdacarrier">Online-Ressource</form>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract displayLabel="Summary">This article focuses on the legal findings of the ICJ concerning the Oslo II Accord, and argues in favour of its relevance in deciding the jurisdictional question raised by the UK before the International Criminal Court (ICC). It also addresses whether invoking this question through a procedure of an amicus curiae during the warrant of arrest stage fits neatly within the ICC’s procedural regime, and it concludes that it does not.</abstract>
  <accessCondition type="use and reproduction">CC BY-SA 4.0</accessCondition>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">El Zeidy, Mohamed M.</note>
  <subject>
    <topic>Humanitäres Völkerrecht</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>International Court of Justice</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>International Law</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Israel-Gaza War</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Völkerrecht</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>amicus curiae</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" authority="gnd" xlink:href="(DE-588)4160781-8">
    <topic>Humanitäres Völkerrecht</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" authority="gnd" xlink:href="(DE-588)4063693-8">
    <topic>Völkerrecht</topic>
  </subject>
  <classification authority="ddc" edition="23">342</classification>
  <location>
    <url displayLabel="raw object" usage="primary display">https://verfassungsblog.de/the-findings-of-the-icj-advisory-opinion-on-the-oslo-accords-and-the-amici-curiae-proceedings-before-the-icc-in-the-situation-of-palestine/</url>
  </location>
  <relatedItem type="host">
    <titleInfo>
      <title>Verfassungsblog</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <identifier type="issn">2366-7044</identifier>
    <name>
      <namePart>Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH</namePart>
    </name>
  </relatedItem>
  <identifier type="doi">10.59704/399ba3adad41768f</identifier>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">241016</recordCreationDate>
    <recordIdentifier source="DE-Verfassungsblog">10.59704/399ba3adad41768f</recordIdentifier>
    <recordOrigin>Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl
				(Revision 1.140 20200717)</recordOrigin>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
