nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/d59729239a627f1f DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 251222s2025||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/d59729239a627f1f doi eng 342 23 Vickers, Lucy Author aut The Fragility of Proportionality Review - Egenberger Revisited Vickers, Lucy Verfassungsblog 2025-12-22 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The latest decision in Egenberger illustrates both the importance of the EU framework for protecting against discrimination on the grounds of religion, and at the same time its fragility. Since the CJEU decision, two German courts have taken turns at assessing the proportionality of the Church’s refusal to employ Ms Egenberger, with different results. The fact that two courts could consider the same facts and reach opposite conclusions without either seeming to have misapplied the law shows how flexible the law can be. CC BY-SA 4.0 Egenberger Religionsfreiheit freedom of religion religious freedom (DE-588)4125186-6 gnd Religionsfreiheit Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/the-fragility-of-proportionality-review/ raw object