nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/13ed3137237bf74c DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 240228s2024||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/13ed3137237bf74c doi eng 342 23 Pichl, Maximilian Author aut The Future of Legal Struggles - Strategic Litigation and Mobilization after the new CEAS Compromise Pichl, Maximilian Verfassungsblog 2024-02-28 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The year 2023 was not a good year for the rights of asylum seekers. The decision about a new legal framework for the Common European Asylum System (CEAS) was described as a "historic moment" (Ylva Johansson), but in fact works as a programme of disenfranchisement. If the pursuit of progressive positions are blocked in the political arena, actors shift their strategies to the judicial field. Even before the summer of migration 2015, successful legal struggles had a significant impact on European migration policy. Push-backs on the high sea were prohibited and transfers of asylum seekers to inhumane conditions under the Dublin system were prevented. The draft for the new CEAS are characterised by attempts to circumvent the consequences of these judgements. In this blogpost, I will discuss what the future of legal struggles within the framework of the new CEAS might look like. CC BY-SA 4.0 CEAS ECJ European Court on Human Rights Human Rights Human Rights Litigation strategic litigation Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/the-future-of-legal-struggles/ raw object