nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/4315b2ae3e542127 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 241125s2024||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/4315b2ae3e542127 doi eng 342 23 De Coninck, Joyce Author aut The Good, the Bad and the Ugly - The EU’s Human Rights Responsibility Gap in Focus De Coninck, Joyce Verfassungsblog 2024-11-25 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In its recent decision in ST v Frontex the CJEU missed once again an opportunity to review Frontex's conduct in light of human rights standards. The decision is the latest in a series of key decisions concerning EU human rights responsibility over the course of the past year, including WS and Others v. Frontex, Hamoudi v. Frontex, Sea Watch v Frontex, as well as Kočner and KS and KD. This contribution explains how some of these cases perpetuate the shortcomings of the EU’s human rights responsibility regime, while others show the Court’s willingness and ability to redress these. CC BY-SA 4.0 CJEU Common Foreign and Security Policy Frontex Grenzschutz Human Rights migration law (DE-588)4158152-0 gnd Grenzschutz Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-3/ raw object