The ICJ Advisory Opinion and Israeli Law - The ICJ Advisory opinion and the duty to distinguish between Israel and the Occupied Territories Hostovsky Brandes, Tamar Author aut Text xx# 2024 Verfassungsblog 2024-10-17 eng
electronic resource
remote
Computermedien
Online-Ressource
 This post examines the relationship between the Advisory Opintion and Israeli law with respect to the duty to distinguish between Israel and the OPT. While the Opinion requires States to distinguish between Israel and the OPT in their dealings with Israel, and to omit acts that may strengthen Israel’s hold of the Territories, calls for such distinction are a civil tort under Israeli law, and those making them can be denied entry to Israel. As a result, Israelis are unlikely to support the Opinion. This will contribute to the growing gap between the international discourse and the domestic discourse in Israel with respect to the OPT. CC BY-SA 4.0 Hostovsky Brandes, Tamar ICJ International Court of Justice International Law Israel and occupied territory Israel-Gaza War OPT United States. International Court of Justice occupation United States. International Court of Justice 342 https://verfassungsblog.de/the-icj-advisory-opinion-and-israeli-law/ Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH 10.59704/62e7e2c461ae93d8 241017 10.59704/62e7e2c461ae93d8 Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl (Revision 1.140 20200717)