<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/76a1858d7cde405b</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/the-icjs-treatment-of-questions-of-occupation-in-gaza/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>The ICJ’s Treatment of Questions of Occupation in Gaza</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Kumaran, Shastikk</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2024-10-12</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Gaza</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Gaza</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Siege</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>occupation</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Gaza</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>The ICJ’s treatment of the state of occupation in Gaza is questionable. While it rightly accepted the functional approach to occupation, I doubt whether Israel was indeed capable of exercising its authority in Gaza sufficiently for its occupation to be found as having continued post-2005. The Court should have relied on Israel’s continued exercise of administrative authority vis-a-vis Gaza residents to find the existence of a state of occupation.</dc:description>
</dc>
