nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/76a1858d7cde405b DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 241012s2024||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/76a1858d7cde405b doi eng 342 23 Kumaran, Shastikk Author aut The ICJ’s Treatment of Questions of Occupation in Gaza Kumaran, Shastikk Verfassungsblog 2024-10-12 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The ICJ’s treatment of the state of occupation in Gaza is questionable. While it rightly accepted the functional approach to occupation, I doubt whether Israel was indeed capable of exercising its authority in Gaza sufficiently for its occupation to be found as having continued post-2005. The Court should have relied on Israel’s continued exercise of administrative authority vis-a-vis Gaza residents to find the existence of a state of occupation. CC BY-SA 4.0 Gaza Gaza Siege occupation (DE-588)4092680-1 gnd Gaza Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/the-icjs-treatment-of-questions-of-occupation-in-gaza/ raw object