<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<marc21:record xmlns:marc21="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <marc21:leader>nam  22     uu 4500</marc21:leader>
  <marc21:controlfield tag="001">10.59704/55748468371d0f88</marc21:controlfield>
  <marc21:controlfield tag="003">DE-Verfassungsblog</marc21:controlfield>
  <marc21:controlfield tag="007">cr|||||</marc21:controlfield>
  <marc21:controlfield tag="008">231123s2023||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng||</marc21:controlfield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" ">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">10.59704/55748468371d0f88</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="2">doi</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">eng</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">342</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="2">23</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">Turkut, Emre</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="e">Author</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="4">aut</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">The Individual Application Mechanism is on the Verge of Collapse, and so is Turkish Constitutionalism</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="c">Turkut, Emre</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1">
    <marc21:subfield code="b">Verfassungsblog</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="c">2023-11-23</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">Text</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="b">txt</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="2">rdacontent</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">Computermedien</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="b">c</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="2">rdamedia</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="b">cr</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="2">rdacarrier</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">Turkey is plunged into yet another profound judicial crisis as the Turkish Constitutional Court (TCC) and the Turkish Court of Cassation (Yargıtay) lock horns over the fate of an imprisoned opposition politician. While two earlier posts published on Verfassungsblog have already meticulously dissected this unfolding judicial drama (here and here), we aim to invigorate the debate with a fresh vantage point. In this piece, we will narrow the focus to one key actor: the TCC. More particularly, we will delve into the implications this evolving judicial crisis holds for the future of the TCC's individual application mechanism.</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">CC BY-SA 4.0</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">AKP</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">Constitutional Crisis</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">Rechtsstaat</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">Turkish Constitutional Court</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">Türkei</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
    <marc21:subfield code="0">(DE-588)4129195-5</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="2">gnd</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="a">Rechtsstaat</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
    <marc21:subfield code="0">(DE-588)4061163-2</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="2">gnd</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="a">Türkei</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">Yildiz, Ali</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="e">Author</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="4">aut</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <marc21:subfield code="a">Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="t">Verfassungsblog</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="x">2366-7044</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
  <marc21:datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
    <marc21:subfield code="u">https://verfassungsblog.de/the-individual-application-mechanism-is-on-the-verge-of-collapse-and-so-is-turkish-constitutionalism/</marc21:subfield>
    <marc21:subfield code="y">raw object</marc21:subfield>
  </marc21:datafield>
</marc21:record>
