nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/afe0341e21e0e7d6 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 240525s2024||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/afe0341e21e0e7d6 doi eng 342 23 Webb, Romany M. Author aut The ITLOS Advisory Opinion and Marine Geoengineering - More Questions, Few Answers Webb, Romany M. Verfassungsblog 2024-05-25 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The ITLOS advisory opinion does little to resolve the long-standing uncertainty regarding the legal status of marine geoengineering activities. On the contrary, the opinion raises more questions than it answers. ITLOS seems content to leave those questions to others. Indeed, in the advisory opinion, ITLOS noted that “marine geoengineering has been the subject of discussions and regulations in various fora,” including the London Convention and Protocol. But after nearly twenty years, the regulatory framework for marine geoengineering adopted by the parties to the London Convention and Protocol is still not, strictly speaking, legally binding. Perhaps the advisory opinion will spur the parties into action. CC BY-SA 4.0 Advisory Opinion Climate Crisis Geoengineering ITLOS Law of the Sea UNCLOS climate litigation geoengineering (DE-588)7714853-8 gnd Geoengineering Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/the-itlos-advisory-opinion-and-marine-geoengineering/ raw object