nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20230921-223435-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 230921s2023||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20230921-223435-0 doi eng 342 23 Lennartz, Jannis Author aut The Legal Art of Judging Art - By defining “pastiche”, Luxemburg will frame the limits of artistic expression in the EU Lennartz, Jannis Verfassungsblog 2023-09-21 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In another round of the case "Metall auf Metall", the German Federal Court of Justice is asking the Court of Justice of the European Union how to define the concept of pastiche. The CJEU response will not only be crucial for the rules of artistic imitation, but also set the legal frame for the digital reference culture of millions, as expressed in Memes and GIFs every day. This Article takes the referral to the CJEU as an opportunity to recapitulate the proceedings with a sideways glance at the Supreme Court’s  Warhol case. Its discussion of transformative use addresses the questions the CJEU will have to answer when defining “pastiche”. How should we deal with the art of imitation? CC BY-SA 4.0 art law Copyright imitation Intellectual Property Kraetzig, Viktoria Author aut Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/the-legal-art-of-judging-art/ raw object