nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/709a3953e9d9481f DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 250910s2025||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/709a3953e9d9481f doi eng 342 23 Mirasola, Chris Author aut (orcid)0009-0008-2878-2290 The Logic of Domestic Military Deployments - What Newsom v. Trump Tells Us About Why Trump Hasn’t Invoked the Insurrection Act Mirasola, Chris Verfassungsblog 2025-09-10 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier With all the outlandish legal arguments the Trump administration has deployed in the nine months since Inauguration Day, it has been genuinely puzzling that the president hasn’t yet invoked the Insurrection Act. Previously undisclosed facts revealed during the Newsom v. Trump bench trial, however, shed light both on how the motivations for these military deployments are being internalized by the military establishment and why there is not yet demand for invoking provisions of the Insurrection Act. CC BY-SA 4.0 Donald Trump Insurrection Act Military Deployment Trump use of armed forces for non-military purposes Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/the-logic-of-domestic-military-deployments/ raw object