The Obligation of Non-recognition, Occupation and the OPT Advisory Opinion Ronen, Yaël Author aut Text xx# 2024 Verfassungsblog 2024-10-14 eng
electronic resource
remote
Computermedien
Online-Ressource
 In the OPT Advisory Opinion, the ICJ considered that Israel’s abuse of its position as an Occupying Power, through de jure and de facto annexation of the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) and continued frustration of the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination, renders Israel’s presence in the OPT unlawful. In determining the legal consequences of this illegal presence, the Court held by a vote of 12:3, that all States are under an obligation “not to recognize as legal the situation arising from the unlawful presence of the State Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory”. This holding was not accompanied by any concretization in either the Advisory Opinion or any of the many declarations and separate opinions attached to it. CC BY-SA 4.0 Ronen, Yaël ICJ Israel-Gaza War OPT Statute of the International Court of Justice | Vereinte Nationen occupation Statute of the International Court of Justice | Vereinte Nationen 342 https://verfassungsblog.de/the-obligation-of-non-recognition-occupation-and-the-opt-advisory-opinion/ Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH 10.59704/1bbe124e441defdd 241014 10.59704/1bbe124e441defdd Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl (Revision 1.140 20200717)