nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20160610-093528 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 160610s2016||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20160610-093528 doi eng 342 23 Duval, Antoine Author aut The Pechstein case: Transnational constitutionalism in inaction at the Bundesgerichtshof Duval, Antoine Verfassungsblog 2016-06-10 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier How independent is the Court of Arbitration for Sport, or the international sport governing bodies (SGB) in general? This question was at the heart of the Pechstein case before the German Federal Court (BGH). The BGH considers that the CAS is a true arbitral tribunal in the sense of German civil procedural law and that it is not structurally imbalanced in favour of the SGBs. In this blog post, I will aim at critically unpacking and deconstructing the four arguments the decision is based on, one by one. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Arbitration dispute settlement Pechstein Sport Law Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/the-pechstein-case-transnational-constitutionalism-in-inaction-at-the-bundesgerichtshof/ raw object