nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/c329fe288e86aa2c DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 260618s2026||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/c329fe288e86aa2c doi eng 342 23 Bobek, Michal Author aut On the Role and Legitimacy of Supranational Courts in a Member State’s Retransition Bobek, Michal Verfassungsblog 2026-06-18 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The last decade has demonstrated what role the Union and in particular the Court of Justice can play in keeping a Member State “within the orbit” of the rule of law. Within that process, the case law of such bodies established numerous red lines as to what practices are not acceptable in a rule of law governed liberal democracy. But will the same red lines now be applicable also to the “good guys”? If yes/no, what will that mean for the legitimacy of those bodies, in particular the European Union? CC BY-SA 4.0 Retransition Rule of Law Ungarn bad guys good guys legitimacy supranational courts systemic resets (DE-588)4078541-5 gnd Ungarn Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/the-role-in-retransition/ raw object