<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/ca99ffd63031501e</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/the-ruling-and-the-mirror/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>The Ruling and the Mirror - The ICJ’s Climate Change Advisory Opinion as Institutional Self-Portrait</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>De Spiegeleir, Antoine</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2025-08-01</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Advisory Opinion</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Climate Crisis</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>ICJ</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>International Court of Justice</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Internationaler Gerichtshof | Den Haag</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Klimakatastrophe</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>climate change</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Internationaler Gerichtshof | Den Haag</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Klimakatastrophe</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>Much of the commentary that has emerged so far, in this symposium and in seemingly every other corner of the internet, focuses on the legal content of the opinion: the articulation of States’ obligations under international law, the rejection of the lex specialis argument, and the recognition of the right to a healthy environment, inter many alia. Yet beyond the legal reasoning and doctrinal outcomes lies something else. The opinion is also an act of identity performance: a way for the ICJ to speak about itself.</dc:description>
</dc>
