<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/af9fb1392cc18c27</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/the-sahels-icc-exit/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>The Sahel’s ICC Exit - Sovereignty as Shield or Responsibility?</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Khachatryan, Davit</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2025-10-17</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>ICC</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Rome Statute</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Sahel</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Shale's ICC Exit</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>The Hague</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Withdrawal</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger trumpet their withdrawal from the International Criminal Court as an act of sovereign defiance and decolonization, but the spectacle barely conceals its true aim: impunity. All three juntas seized power by force and stand accused of atrocities committed by their militaries and Russian-backed auxiliaries. By rejecting The Hague, they aren’t reclaiming justice for Africa; they’re dismantling the last external check on their power, turning “sovereignty” into a shield against accountability and leaving victims in the Sahel with nowhere to turn.</dc:description>
</dc>
