<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/ba3e9215b8eeb22e</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/the-salience-of-writtenness-and-unwrittenness-as-constitutional-categories-in-canada/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>The Salience of “Writtenness” and “Unwrittenness” as Constitutional Categories in Canada</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>MacDonnell, Vanessa</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2024-07-08</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Canada</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>constitution</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>ICONS2024</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Unwritten Constitution</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>Canada's Constitution sits somewhere between the paradigms of a fully codified written and partially codified unwritten constitutional order. This blog post explains why the differentiation between the written and unwritten matters for our understanding of Canada's constitutional system with a view to terminological, institutional, proceduaral, and policial questions.</dc:description>
</dc>
