nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20221223-001651-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 221222s2022||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20221223-001651-0 doi eng 342 23 Kurtul, Aytekin Kaan Author aut The Soviet Famine and Criminalising “Denialism” - Choosing between EU Law and Human Rights? Kurtul, Aytekin Kaan Verfassungsblog 2022-12-22 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The precedent set by international human rights law and the case law of European constitutional courts allows the exceptional criminalisation of Holocaust denial. But the same “exceptional” treatment does not apply to other events which may or may not consist of a “genocide, crime against humanity or a war crime”. Thus, EU Member States struggle to strike a balance between their obligations deriving from international human rights law and those deriving from EU law. CC BY-SA 4.0 Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/the-soviet-famine-and-criminalising-denialism/ raw object