nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20170125-103902 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 170124s2017||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20170125-103902 doi eng 342 23 Lock, Tobias Author aut The Supreme Court in Miller – some early comments Lock, Tobias Verfassungsblog 2017-01-24 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The UK Supreme Court’s decision in the Miller appeal was probably greeted with a sigh of relief in 10 Downing Street. Sure, the Government will now need to seek parliamentary approval for triggering Article 50 TEU and starting the formal process of withdrawing from the EU, but the much greater political danger of having to also seek the consent of the devolved parliaments of Scotland, Northern Ireland, and Wales, has not materialised. What follows are a few brief comments on the Supreme Court’s reasoning and an assessment of its implications for the future. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 brexit Miller v. Secretary of State Parliamentary Sovereignty UK Supreme Court Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/the-supreme-court-in-miller-some-early-comments/ raw object