<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/19a43f9773c41828</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/the-unfinished-repair/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>The Unfinished Repair - Germany’s Dualism and the Implementation of the New EU Anti-Corruption Directive</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Pohlreich, Erol</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Kotsalis, Philippos-Georgios</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Tale Ismaili, Nastaran</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2026-07-21</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Deutschland</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Directive (EU) 2026/1021</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Maskenaffäre</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>criminal liability</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>dualism</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>influence offence</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>section 108e StGB</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>section 108f StGB</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Deutschland</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>The new Directive (EU) 2026/1021, adopted on 29 April 2026, is the most ambitious expression to date of the EU’s anti-corruption architecture. It declares that elected representatives stand under the same anti-corruption standard as civil servants. In substance, that promise fails twice. First, the Directive enables, but does not require, this change. Secondly, the adopted harmonised definition of the “influence offence” fails to capture wrongdoing such as Germany’s mask-contract scandal (“Maskenaffäre”) – monetising mandate-derived political access outside parliamentary proceedings.</dc:description>
</dc>
