nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/79e2e00944e8a696 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 240411s2024||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/79e2e00944e8a696 doi eng 342 23 Mimran, Tal Author aut Third Provisional Measures in South Africa v Israel - Reflections on the Right to be Heard and on Substantive Justice Mimran, Tal Verfassungsblog 2024-04-11 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier On March 28, 2024, the ICJ issued its third provisional measures order in South Africa v Israel. The Court ordered further, more pointed, measures towards Israel to ensure the provision of humanitarian aid throughout Gaza. In this blog post, I consider that the right to be heard in the course of this third order has not been fully guaranteed since the ICJ based its ruling on the international reports which were not provided, known, and considered by either of the parties. Moreover, I argue that the ICJ underscored its decision on humanitarian law rather than obligations to prevent genocide. CC BY-SA 4.0 ICJ Israel Israel Provisional Measures Right to be Heard Statute of the International Court of Justice | Vereinte Nationen (DE-588)4027808-6 gnd Israel (DE-588)7577455-0 gnd Statute of the International Court of Justice | Vereinte Nationen Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/third-provisional-measures/ raw object