Third Provisional Measures in South Africa v Israel - Reflections on the Right to be Heard and on Substantive Justice

Third Provisional Measures in South Africa v Israel - Reflections on the Right to be Heard and on Substantive Justice Mimran, Tal Author aut Text xx# 2024 Verfassungsblog 2024-04-11 eng On March 28, 2024, the ICJ issued its third provisional measures order in South Africa v Israel. The Court ordered further, more pointed, measures towards Israel to ensure the provision of humanitarian aid throughout Gaza. In this blog post, I consider that the right to be heard in the course of this third order has not been fully guaranteed since the ICJ based its ruling on the international reports which were not provided, known, and considered by either of the parties. Moreover, I argue that the ICJ underscored its decision on humanitarian law rather than obligations to prevent genocide. CC BY-SA 4.0 Mimran, Tal ICJ Israel Israel Provisional Measures Right to be Heard Statute of the International Court of Justice | Vereinte Nationen Israel Statute of the International Court of Justice | Vereinte Nationen 342 https://verfassungsblog.de/third-provisional-measures/ Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH 10.59704/79e2e00944e8a696 240411 10.59704/79e2e00944e8a696 Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl (Revision 1.140 20200717)