nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20190517-144242-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 190411s2019||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20190517-144242-0 doi eng 342 23 Bogdanowicz, Piotr Author aut Three Steps Ahead, One Step Aside: The AG’s Opinion in the Commission v. Poland Case Bogdanowicz, Piotr Verfassungsblog 2019-04-11 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In the infringement case about forced retirement of Polish Supreme Court judges, the Advocate General has delivered his much-awaited opinion. The AG proposed that the Court should declare that Poland failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 19 TEU. I do agree with this conclusion. I do not share, however, the Advocate General's view that the complaint of the Commission should be rejected as inadmissible as far as it is based on the right to an independent judge under Article 49 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Art. 19 TEU judicial independence Polish Supreme Court Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/three-steps-ahead-one-step-aside-the-ags-opinion-in-the-commission-v-poland-case/ raw object