nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/7d8a12933ab35807 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 250129s2025||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/7d8a12933ab35807 doi eng 342 23 Saxer, Urs Author aut TikTok’s last dance Saxer, Urs Verfassungsblog 2025-01-29 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier “On January 19, we still have President Biden, and on January 19, as I understand it, we shut down.” With these words—foreshadowing the final ban of the TikTok app in the United States—Noel Francisco, legal representative of ByteDance, the Chinese parent company, addressed the U.S. Supreme Court during oral arguments on January 10, 2025. One week later, the Supreme Court issued its ruling: TikTok’s appeal was dismissed. The court’s reasoning merits examination, while the implications remain uncertain, particularly as a Trump executive order temporarily blocks the ban’s enforcement. CC BY-SA 4.0 District of Columbia. Circuit Court Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte | Straßburg Europäischer Gerichtshof | Luxemburg (Stadt) Executive Order SCOTUS Tik Tok Tik Tok ban Tik and Tok Trump Donald | 1946- | Geschäftsmann Unternehmer Politiker US Supreme Court USA. Supreme Court (DE-588)14906-8 gnd District of Columbia. Circuit Court (DE-588)1003803-6 gnd Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte | Straßburg (DE-588)5103273-9 gnd Europäischer Gerichtshof | Luxemburg (Stadt) (DE-588)10189860-5 gnd Tik and Tok (DE-588)118834312 gnd Trump Donald | 1946- | Geschäftsmann Unternehmer Politiker (DE-588)35650-5 gnd USA. Supreme Court Kollenberg, Roman Author aut Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/tiktoks-last-dance/ raw object