TikTok’s last dance Saxer, Urs Author aut Kollenberg, Roman Author aut Text xx# 2025 Verfassungsblog 2025-01-29 eng
electronic resource
remote
Computermedien
Online-Ressource
 “On January 19, we still have President Biden, and on January 19, as I understand it, we shut down.” With these words—foreshadowing the final ban of the TikTok app in the United States—Noel Francisco, legal representative of ByteDance, the Chinese parent company, addressed the U.S. Supreme Court during oral arguments on January 10, 2025. One week later, the Supreme Court issued its ruling: TikTok’s appeal was dismissed. The court’s reasoning merits examination, while the implications remain uncertain, particularly as a Trump executive order temporarily blocks the ban’s enforcement. CC BY-SA 4.0 Saxer, Urs District of Columbia. Circuit Court Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte | Straßburg Europäischer Gerichtshof | Luxemburg (Stadt) Executive Order SCOTUS Tik Tok Tik Tok ban Tik and Tok Trump Donald | 1946- | Geschäftsmann Unternehmer Politiker US Supreme Court USA. Supreme Court District of Columbia. Circuit Court Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte | Straßburg Europäischer Gerichtshof | Luxemburg (Stadt) Tik and Tok Trump Donald | 1946- | Geschäftsmann Unternehmer Politiker USA. Supreme Court 342 https://verfassungsblog.de/tiktoks-last-dance/ Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH 10.59704/7d8a12933ab35807 250129 10.59704/7d8a12933ab35807 Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl (Revision 1.140 20200717)